TEA-Trust
----------
June
1st 2003 Meeting
Harish
Chawla
This
is a renewals proposal. Asha-MIT was supposed to send money in March.
Hence
the delay in taking up the agenda.
Overall
discussions were centered around the need to pay for a Coordinator Rs3,000
and
a facilitator Rs1,000 - and the value of their roles.
TEA-Trust
funding covers only two schools and concerns raised by Mugdha and Nilanjan
were
to find more information on a plan of action for the rest of 13-14 schools
under
the Trust managment.
Other
inputs were to check with the state resource center for learning materials,
suitability
of the same, and answers to the challenge of having low paid TEA-Trust
teachers
motivate higher paid Govt. teaching staff.
Asha-MIT
recognized that TEA-Trust has indicated that the teachers would like to have
a
salary raise.
Melli
mentioned that the school area has a huge 'dust storm' problem more due to the
large
heavy commercial vehicle traffic in the
region.
Asha-MIT
approved funding the back dues.
Yes
Votes: 4,
Abstain
: 3
No
: 0.
TEA-Trust
Project steward to get more info regarding questions raised during the meeting.
TEA
Trust
----------
Dilip
Warrier
April
2003 (Online Vote)
The
following asha-strategy poll is now closed. Here are the
final
results:
POLL
QUESTION: Should we accept TEA trust for funding,
pending
a revised funding proposal from
them
in collaboration with Asha Chennai?
CHOICES
AND RESULTS
-
Yes, 7 votes, 100.00%
-
No, 0 votes, 0.00%
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
TEA Trust
(Coordinator : Dilip)
9th June 2002
History with Asha: Asha Boston has funded them in the past
but no records found. Last person to talk with them was Nandini who is
untraceable. 10 years ago, Berkeley funded them and a site visit
report is available on
Berkeley site.
Site: Kanchipuram district in Tamil Nadu, a few kms from
Chengalpatnam. Target population is mainly Dalit, with an added focus on
child-labour working on brink-kilns. The project covers 5 government schools
(644 children around 50% girls) with 18 teachers.
Org: R s Arputam is contact person for TEA. Dilip received
prompt replies to his queries, so fairly well connected in terms of
accessibility. TEA has been involved in the community for quite a long time. It
works in association with TANPIC (a network of NGOs) that has received
permission from the AEEO (Asst Elementary Education Officer) to work with
schools in the area. How this translates to willing participation of the
school/teachers is not clear.
Project aims to
1. elevate standard of
teaching
2. strengthen PTA and
village education committees.
3. child labour issues.
4. health camps
5. mobilize local
resources for improvement of education
Implementation
1. reconstitute
meetings of village ed committees.
2. Initiate program
with 3 day program to evaluate status. Experts
will monitor students'
progress over the course of 3 years.
3. training program for
teachers.
4. Improvement in
school infrastructure - toilet, garden, water, school environment with a view
to improve retention.
5. health camps,
sensitize teachers to problems of working children.
Main Costs
Meetings: Rs 5,000 per
village per meeting Village education implementation plan Rs 10,000 per village to be used
as seed money for raising more money. 3 day program to cost Rs 30,000 furniture - Rs 3000
per school
Comments:
Ranjini : Positive that
they're bolstering existing infrastructure.
Dilip : Ideas are good,
but the budget throws you off.
Questions raised:
1. Can Ram make a site
visit?
2. What is the
motivation for teachers? Do they get certification after training program?
3. How has TEA's
sources for funding in the past few years?
3. What is the role of
2 teachers meant for child issues?
4. Can we get more
information about TANPIC?
5. Can we try to get
more information from Berkley?
Dilip to get in touch with Ram and Balaji.